Building the Crack Size versus Number of Cycles (a_N) Curve - Maple Application Center
Application Center Applications Building the Crack Size versus Number of Cycles (a_N) Curve

Building the Crack Size versus Number of Cycles (a_N) Curve

Author
: Jorge Durán
Engineering software solutions from Maplesoft
This Application runs in Maple. Don't have Maple? No problem!
 Try Maple free for 15 days!
Perhaps the most difficult task when Variable Amplitude ( VA ) loading Fatigue Crack Propagation ( FCP ) tests are made is the precise determination of crack size ( a ). The Back Face Strain ( BFS ) is a powerful approach to misleading this problem. For C(T) or DC(T) type specimens (see Figure 1), crack size versus BFS calibration curves are available in the normalized form EBCW = A(beta) , where E is the Young Modulus [MN/m2], B and W are geometrical dimensions of C(T) or DC(T) specimens [m], C is the compliance (inverse of stiffness), equal to the ratio BFS/P ( P is the applied load) [usn/N], and beta is the ratio a/W . The aN procedure of the present Maple worksheet take as input a cycle and peaks data file acquired during the test (variable m of string type), an initial value of crack size (variable a0 of float type) and the goal graphic introduced by the variable G of symbol type. Graphics can be of two types, crack size versus number of cycles ( N ) (in this case give the AN value to G variable) or crack size less initial crack size versus N (use AA0N in G variable).

Application Details

Publish Date: November 11, 2003
Created In: Maple 6
Language: English

Tags

mechanics

More Like This

Designing a More Effective Car Radiator
Optimizing the Controller Design to Guide the Motion of a Maglev Train
Classroom Tips and Techniques: Simultaneous Diagonalization and the Generalized Eigenvalue Problem
Analytical Treatment of the Involute Gears Geometry
Classroom Tips and Techniques: An Undamped Coupled Oscillator
Tensor Analysis of Deformation